Bethenny Frankel, the former "Real Housewives of New York City" star, has sparked a thought-provoking discussion about the role of celebrity endorsements in political campaigns. In a series of Instagram videos, Frankel shared her perspective on how Kamala Harris' reliance on Hollywood's elite may have ultimately cost the vice president the 2024 presidential election.

Bethenny Frankel's Candid Critique: Celebrities No Longer Sway Voters

The Perils of Aligning with Celebrities

Bethenny Frankel, a seasoned reality TV personality, believes that Kamala Harris' decision to align herself with a host of celebrities during her presidential campaign was a misstep. Frankel argues that the American public is no longer swayed by the endorsements of Hollywood's elite, stating, "I genuinely did not think that aligning with celebrities is and was a good idea." She contends that the public views such associations as "the forbidden fruit" and "the shiny object," ultimately failing to influence voter sentiment.

The Disconnect Between Celebrities and Everyday Americans

Frankel's critique extends beyond the ineffectiveness of celebrity endorsements, as she also addresses the perceived disconnect between the political elite and the everyday American. She argues that some "elitist people" believe their vote carries more weight due to their socioeconomic status, education level, or professional background, a notion she firmly rejects. Frankel's perspective suggests that the public is increasingly wary of the perceived disconnect between the political establishment and the struggles faced by the average citizen.

The Futility of Star Power in Political Campaigns

Delving deeper into her analysis, Frankel points out that despite the impressive social media following of the celebrities who endorsed Kamala Harris, their influence failed to "move the needle" in the Democratic party's favor. She bluntly states, "That means [celebrity endorsements are] a spinning wheel, it's useless, it's a flex and it doesn't even do anything." This observation underscores Frankel's belief that the power of celebrity endorsements has waned, and that political campaigns must find more effective ways to connect with and mobilize voters.

The Backlash Against "Out-of-Touch" Celebrities

Frankel's critique has resonated with her followers, who have echoed her sentiments. One commenter expressed the view that "People who are struggling with paying for groceries and their rent do not need any advice from out of touch celebs." Another agreed, stating that "We don't need wealthy celebrities who are out of touch with everyday lives in the US to tell us how to vote. It was a ridiculously transparent and condescending way to talk to voters that are living pay check to pay check." These comments suggest a growing public sentiment that celebrity involvement in political campaigns is perceived as elitist and disconnected from the everyday concerns of the electorate.

The Shift in Voter Priorities

Frankel's analysis highlights a broader shift in voter priorities, where the public is increasingly focused on practical issues that directly impact their daily lives, rather than being swayed by the endorsements of famous personalities. This shift underscores the need for political candidates to develop more authentic and relatable connections with their constituents, moving beyond the superficial appeal of celebrity associations.In the end, Bethenny Frankel's critique of Kamala Harris' celebrity-driven campaign serves as a cautionary tale for future political aspirants. As the public's trust in the influence of Hollywood's elite wanes, candidates must find more effective ways to engage with and represent the diverse needs and concerns of the American electorate.