Music
Federal Court Denies Music Publishers' Request to Halt AI Training
2025-03-26

A significant legal development has emerged in the ongoing battle between music publishers and artificial intelligence companies. In a recent ruling, U.S. District Judge Eumi Lee dismissed an attempt by three major music publishers to prevent Anthropic, an AI firm backed by Amazon, from utilizing their song lyrics for training purposes. The court determined that the publishers failed to demonstrate how Anthropic's actions negatively impacted the existing licensing market. Additionally, concerns were raised regarding the practicality of enforcing any potential court order due to the vast scope of works involved.

At the core of this dispute lies the accusation that Anthropic improperly used copyrighted lyrics from renowned artists such as Katy Perry, the Rolling Stones, and Beyoncé. For instance, when questioned about Perry’s "Roar," Anthropic's chatbot, Claude, produced a near-perfect replica of the song's lyrics. Despite this, the court highlighted the impractical nature of defining which songs would be included under an injunction, noting the lack of clear guidelines provided by the publishers. Furthermore, Anthropic argued that excluding an unspecified volume of material from its training library would pose insurmountable challenges, necessitating continuous updates and retraining efforts.

The decision underscores the complexities surrounding intellectual property in the age of AI. While the court acknowledged the publishers' concerns about lost licensing opportunities, it found insufficient evidence to support claims that Anthropic's practices have diminished license fees or harmed future negotiations with other AI firms. Instead, the court suggested that monetary compensation could be pursued if the publishers succeed in their lawsuit. This case serves as a pivotal moment in shaping the future relationship between creators and technology companies, emphasizing the importance of balancing innovation with respect for creative rights. As discussions on fair use principles continue, both sides strive to establish a framework that promotes progress while safeguarding artistic contributions.

More Stories
see more