Television
Fraser Institute News Release: 96% of television news coverage of Ottawa’s child care, dental care and pharma care programs failed to report on costs
2024-09-26

Uncovering the Hidden Costs: A Comprehensive Analysis of Media Coverage on Federal Spending Announcements

In a revealing study conducted by the Fraser Institute, a non-partisan Canadian public policy think-tank, the spotlight has been cast on the media's coverage of the federal government's recent social programs, including child care, pharma care, and dental care. The findings shed light on the critical issue of transparency and the public's right to know the true financial implications of these initiatives.

Shedding Light on the Hidden Costs of Canada's Social Programs

Lack of Cost Reporting in Television News Coverage

The study, which analyzed the content of CTV and CBC television news coverage from 2021 to 2024, uncovered a startling trend. Despite the significant financial implications of these new government programs, the research found that only a small fraction of the coverage, just 4.1% for CTV and 3.7% for CBC, actually reported the specific costs to taxpayers.This lack of cost reporting is particularly concerning, as television news remains a primary source of information for many Canadians. The public's understanding of these programs and their ability to make informed decisions about their tax dollars are directly impacted by the media's coverage.

Contradicting the Finance Minister's Mandate

The study also revealed that there were only five mentions on CBC and two mentions on CTV regarding the fact that these new programs would create permanent spending, which directly contradicts the Finance Minister's mandate to "avoid creating new permanent spending."This discrepancy raises questions about the government's transparency and the media's role in holding them accountable. Canadians deserve to have a clear understanding of the long-term financial implications of these programs, and the lack of reporting on this critical aspect undermines the public's ability to make informed decisions.

Minimal Cost Reporting in Government Communications

The analysis also examined government press releases related to these programs, and the findings were equally troubling. Only 0.6% of the government's own communications reported the costs associated with these initiatives.This lack of transparency from the government itself further compounds the issue, as the public is left with limited access to the financial details necessary to fully comprehend the impact of these programs.

Effective Government Messaging Overshadows Cost Considerations

The study's author, Lydia Miljan, senior fellow at the Fraser Institute, noted that the government's messaging strategy has been highly effective in directing media attention towards the purported benefits of these programs, rather than their costs and funding mechanisms."Examining the phrases associated with stories on the new programs illustrates how effective the government was in focusing media attention on the programs and their purported benefits, rather than on their costs and how to fund them," Miljan said.This strategic approach by the government raises concerns about the public's ability to make informed decisions, as the true financial implications of these programs are not being adequately communicated.

The Public's Right to Know

The Fraser Institute's study underscores the critical importance of transparency and the public's right to know the true costs of government initiatives. As Miljan stated, "Given that the federal government has put significant resources into these three social programs, it is not unreasonable for the public to expect that journalists critically evaluate these programs, particularly with respect to how they will be paid for by taxpayers."The findings of this study serve as a wake-up call for both the media and the government to prioritize the dissemination of accurate and comprehensive information to the Canadian public. Only through a well-informed citizenry can the true costs and benefits of these programs be properly evaluated and debated.
More Stories
see more