The 'Sad Beige' Lawsuit: First-of-Its-Kind Case on Copying Social Media Aesthetic
Sydney Nicole Gifford's lawsuit against Alyssa Sheil has brought a unique case to the forefront of the digital world. Both content creators have built their brands around a neutral, beige aesthetic, but now find themselves in a legal battle over alleged content replication. Unraveling the First-of-Its-Kind Lawsuit in Influencer Aesthetics
Who is Sydney Nicole Gifford?
Sydney Nicole Gifford, a 24-year-old social media influencer, has amassed nearly half a million followers across Instagram, TikTok, and Amazon Storefront. Hailing from Austin, Texas but now living in Minneapolis, she creates content centered around her home, fashion, and Amazon finds. Her neutral-toned vibe, with shades of brown and tan hues, sets her apart. Spending several hours a day capturing and creating content, she promotes brand products and services. As she said to The Verge in late November, "I think I feel more calm in neutral spaces. Now my favorite color is beige. It is a sad beige home, and I like it."
This has become her signature, and she has grown her business into a multi-thousand dollar operation. Her Instagram bio showcases her influence and the following she has garnered.
Who is Alyssa Sheil?
Alyssa Sheil, a 21-year-old content creator, shares fashion and lifestyle content with nearly half a million followers on Instagram and TikTok combined. From Williamson County, Texas, she curates her content to align with a beige aesthetic as well. All her posts, from outfit of the day to home decor finds and beauty-related photos, are neutral-toned. When speaking with The Verge, she described her decor as "definitely very calming. I just want it to all be cohesive and plain."
Her presence in the digital space is significant, and she has her own unique style and following.
Why is Sydney Nicole Gifford suing Alyssa Sheil?
Gifford alleges that Sheil mimicked the vibe of her social media content, including fonts, camera angles, apartment decor, similar Amazon products, and even physical appearance. In the original April filing obtained by PEOPLE, she brought eight claims: federal copyright infringement, vicarious copyright infringement, Digital Millennium Copyright Act violation, trade dress infringement, misappropriation, tortious interference with prospective business relations, unfair trade practices and unfair competition, and unjust enrichment.
They had a brief history together as both had lived in Austin at one point. The replication of content started after they met in January 2023 to discuss a potential collaboration. During a photoshoot promoted on their respective accounts, a few days later, Alyssa blocked Sydney from viewing her content on Instagram and TikTok, alleging that the defendant's "platforms changed ostensibly."
Has Alyssa Sheil responded to Sydney Gifford's claims?
Sheil's attorney responded on Aug. 5, denying "every allegation in the complaint." According to the court document, the case "stems" from "jealousy." When they first met, Sheil was "younger and more successful on certain social media platforms that Gifford had not yet maximized." The documents allege that "it was Gifford who asked Sheil" content-related questions.
Still, Sheil emphasized that it's the nature of the fashion and influencer industries for similar content creators to collaborate, adopt, and evolve on trends. She is confident in her position as a creator despite the legal proceedings.
What's next for Alyssa Sheil and Sydney Gifford?
Many are watching this first-of-its-kind case closely as the two influencers await trial. Gifford's Texas lawsuit seeks damages that could reach into the millions. The legal system's role in protecting the vibe of a content creator's online presence is now being questioned.
The outcome of this case will likely have implications for the future of influencer content and intellectual property in the digital age.